Fri, 14 Apr 2006

75 years of the Spanish dream

Recently Spain remembered the 65th anniversary of our tragic Civil War, an episode which broke the state in two halves which still today haven't been glued together at all.

The origin of that nightmare is the dream of many Spanish people of the early 20th Century. In the morning of the 14th of April, 1931, the Second Spanish Republic was proclaimed in Madrid, after two days before, a majority of republican and leftist parties won the local elections; many people celebrated throughout the Spanish territory, and the tricolour flag was shown in many town hall buildings. With the king in exile after these quick happenings, Spain was again a Republic, as decided by the election results.

The Republic brought many social measures to Spain: women suffrage, eight-hour day and many other labour related improvements. The nobility titles were abolished, and those properties were confiscated by the government. And this was just the provisional government. All of this is regarded like a big social and cultural revolution, which was just starting.

Not everyone was happy about this, of course. The newly approved Constitution of December 9 gave the government power to confiscate many of the Church's properties, and limit their great power in political matters. Soon, the episcopacy came with a strategy to defeat the Republic in any possible way. The Royalists were also not happy. There were a series of revolts in the South, and an attempt of coup d'etat by General Sanjurjo. These attacks were repealed; the Republic was still strong.

In 1933, the Anarchists started to be seriously unhappy about the moderate path the government was leading and started striking, which led to violent repression by the Government. The General elections of November brought a victory of the right and extreme-right, and many social and anti-church measures were repealed. Riots and strikes spread throughout the territory.

The Martial Law proclaimed by the right wing government resulted in thousands beings imprisoned. Things went even worse when three ministers of the fascist CEDA entered the Republican Government. A big worker uprise started the 1st of October in Asturies, and Catalunya proclaimed the Catalan Republic.

The revolts were supressed by General Franco, who would be well known in the world just a few years later. Thousands were killed and injuried during the few weeks of revolt, and the Socialist Party was dissolved, leaving the Spanish Courts with barely no left representation.

The next years saw a very unstable government from the right due to internal disputes within the parties that formed it. New elections were called in 1936, and the left united under the Popular Front, which won by a slight margin; Manuel Azaña was the new president. The right, the church and the army continued to undermine the Republic in any possible way. In an attempt to make the military heads more loyal to the established government, the fascist Falange Española was dissolved.

The 2nd Spanish Republic received a massive blow on the 17th of July, 1936 when Franco and other generals attempted a new coup d'etat in the Northern African territories. The Republic started to die as people started fighting the coup back, and the Spanish Civil War started throughout the territory. With the aid of Fascist Germany and Italy, Franco managed to seize control of more and more areas of Spain during the nearly three years of war, and the Government of the Republic had to move a number of times, to València and Barcelona. In January 1939, most of Spain was in Franco's hands, and Catalunya soon fell. Two months later, the fascist troops entered Madrid, and hours later, València surrended.

Still today, people talk about “dos Españas”, the victorious and the defeated. Still today, the is much difficulty in having official recognition for the thousands who died while defending what a majority of people had voted for in a democratic way. Still today, one of the major political parties in Spain refuses to acknowledge what the forty years of Franco meant for the disidents, for the exiled, and for the dead. They are the legacy of Franco.

Today Spain celebrates the 75th anniversary of our Second Republic, with many events in many cities, which will be ongoing for a few weeks. Izquierda Republicana has a good list of events.

Thank you for posting this. I find the Spanish revolution rather fascinating, and it was good to have something to read about it.

Posted by Thomas Thurman at Fri Apr 14 19:08:57 2006

I always find it amazing that after Franco died that the new King (Juan Carlos) his anointed successor saved Spanish Democracy against another coup. Redemption?

Posted by Richard Kleeman at Sat Apr 15 00:26:55 2006

http://www.sbhac.net/

por si no la conocían, la mejor fuente de información en internet sobre la guerra civil y revolución en territorio liberado

los anarquistas no se rebelaron de caprichosos, investiga por lo que se luchaba y por qué tanta gente se jugo la vida

Posted by javier at Sat Apr 15 02:26:43 2006

When Calvo Sotelo (monarchist MP and one of the leaders of the opposition) interpellated in the Cortes on the assassinations of clergy and on the expropriations, Dolores 'La Pasionaria' Ibárruri (communist MP) publicly woved that it was the last time he spoke against the government. So did it happen. On the night of 12/13 July 1936, Calvo Sotelo was abducted from his house and murdered by a 15-man commando of Assault Guards (special police unit) and Socialist Youth (para-military organisation). This was the last spark that triggered the civil war and convicted Franco to join the coup despite his earlier objections. On 17 July, the Spanish contingent in Morocco rebelled. The next day Franco took flight to Africa, joined the rebels, and accepted the command.

Franco's Spain was a brutal and cheerless dictature. It still was, IMHO, better than what Spain would face had the communist remained in power.

Posted by Eleutheria at Sat Apr 15 09:41:51 2006

The leader of the conservative opposition, Calvo Sotelo, protested against what he viewed as an escalating anti-religious terror, expropriations, and hasty agricultural reforms, which he considered Bolshevist and Anarchist, advocating the creation of a corporative state and proudly declaring that if such a state was a fascist state, he was also a fascist. He also declared that Spanish soldiers would be mad to not rise for Spain against Anarchy. In turn, the leader of the communists, Dolores Ibarruri, vowed that Calvo Sotelo's speech would be his last speech in the Cortes. On 12 July 1936, José Castillo, a member of the Socialist Party and lieutenant in the Assault Guards, a special police corps created to deal with urban violence, was murdered by a 'far right' group in Madrid. The following day, Sotelo was killed, supposedly in revenge, by a commando unit of the Assault Guards. The assassination aroused suspicions of government involvement in the act and precipitated the following events, being the spark that moved the Nationalist forces to act.

Posted by mumble wikipedia mumble at Sun Apr 16 01:36:31 2006

II República, 75 años desde el último sistema genocida en España

La ONU define genocidio como "cualquiera de los siguientes actos cometidos con la intención de destruir, en todo o en parte, un grupo nacional, étnico, racial o religioso: matar miembros, causarles daño físico o mental, infligirles calculadamente condiciones de vida para su destrucción parcial o completa, imponer medidas para prevenir su nacimiento o transferir forzosamente hijos del grupo". Según esa definición se cumple estos días el 75 aniversario del último régimen que en España primero permitió por inacción y más tarde alentó y dirigió un genocidio.

Los "legítimos gobernantes demócraticos" de la II República fueron, primero, testigos inhertes y, luego, actores y directores del asesinato de alrededor de 10.000 católicos -hombres, mujeres y niños- cuya única culpa era practicar cierta religión, o ser hijos de alguien que la practicaba o, simplemente, estudiar en un centro regentado por religiosos. Por supuesto sin juicio, jurado ni condena escrita pues es evidente que no cometían ningún delito. Después vino una guerra civil y una dictadura para continuar con la tradición de falta de estado de derecho de aquellos años, pero nunca hubo otro genocidio.

Que una parte de la sociedad actual, por pequeña y radicalizada que esté, quiera hacer un homenaje a semejante aberración historica y que quiera hacer a la democracia actual heredera de semejante baño de sangre hace revolvérsele las tripas a alguien que es un republicano liberal como yo. Si insisten en vincular la palabra "república" con semejantes acciones nos obligarán a los republicanos democráticos a buscar un termino menos manchado de sangre. Se aceptan sugerencias...

Posted by Miguel A. Arévalo at Sun Apr 16 15:05:10 2006

busca información sobre la tasa de muertes de niños por causas evitables de los gobiernos de franco y primo de rivera

busca el "ingreso per cápita" de aquellas epócas y luego dilo de vuelta si te da la cara

la miseria más implacable, miles de muertes evitables

y al mismo tiempo el más obsceno desperdicio de riquezas

que se cometieron atrocidades en el bando antifascista es cierto, y fueron muchos los antifascistas de renombre (y anónimos) que las combatieron

450 comunas libertarias, de las cuales sólo 20 eran totales -es decir que todas las tierras cultivadas de la zona eran colectivizadas-, qué te dice eso?, no eran dos demonios enfrentándose
no da igual que los fascistas tengan el poder o que los anarquistas lo tengan, unos están harto ansiosos de decidir por los otros y del otro lado lo que se quiere es libertad para poder organizarse de forma igualitaria y solidaria, y sí, la propiedad y el estado son incompatibles con eso

Posted by el último? at Sun Apr 16 23:35:27 2006

No es lo que quiera hacer alguien cuando llegue al poder, es lo que realmente hace al final y en eso comunistas, fascistas, anarquistas, socialistas ... todos iguales. q.e.d.

Posted by Miguel A. Arévalo at Mon Apr 17 00:17:36 2006

It is not surprising that still today there is some debate on the events of the Spanish Civil War. It is nearly the same in Italy: we had a 20 years long fascist regime, which in the end brought the country in a terrible war, and in a civil war, lasting nearly 2 years (autumn 1943-april 1945) in the northern half of Italian territory.

Despite these events, there are still politicians and people who declare themselves proud of being fascist and that minimize the crimes of the fascist regime. Some of these parties took part in the recent election, inside the (ex) Prime Minister Berlusconi right-wing coalition, and during the pre-vote debates on TV, one of these persons declared that during the 2. World War it was not true that the Allies were "the right side" and that it was right to fight aside with Nazi Germany even after the official armistice in September 1943...

That's why I'm not surprised there are still debates on this kind of matters...

Posted by Vincenzo Vaccarino at Tue Apr 18 08:59:21 2006

"No es lo que quiera hacer alguien cuando llegue al poder, es lo que realmente hace al final y en eso comunistas, fascistas, anarquistas, socialistas"

por favor, volve a leer lo que dije

los anarquistas en la revolución española tenían bien en claro lo que querían, y que no era cuestión de intenciones sino de metódo, de práctica

no sólo fue así en las comunas (la colectivización LIBRE y VOLUNTARIA que ya te señale) sino también en los lugares más adversos para la organización libertaria: las milicias

en palabras de Durruti:

"Pienso -y todo cuanto está sucediendo a nuestro alrededor confirma mi pensamiento- que una milicia obrera no puede ser dirigida según las reglas clásicas del Ejército. Considero pues, que la disciplina, la coordinación y la realización de un plan, son cosas indispensables. Pero todo eso no se puede interpretar según los criterios que estaban en uso en el mundo que estamos destruyendo. Tenemos que construir sobre bases nuevas. Según yo, y según mis compañeros, la solidaridad entre los hombres es el mejor incentivo para despertar la responsabilidad individual que sabe aceptar la disciplina como un acto de autodisciplina.
"Se nos impone la guerra, y la lucha que debe regirla difiere de la táctica con que hemos conducido la que acabamos de ganar, pero la finalidad de nuestro combate es el triunfo de la revolución. Esto significa no solamente la victoria sobre el enemigo, sino que ella debe obtenerse por un cambio radical del hombre. Para que ese cambio se opere es preciso que el hombre aprenda a vivir y conducirse como un hombre libre, aprendizaje en el que se desarrollan sus facultades de responsabilidad y de personalidad como dueño de sus propios actos. El obrero en el trabajo no solamente cambia las formas de la materia, sino que también, a través de esa tarea, se modifica a sí mismo. El combatiente no es otra cosa que un obrero utilizando el fusil como instrumento, y sus actos deben tender al mismo fin que el obrero. En la lucha no se puede comportar como un soldado que le mandan, sino como un hombre consciente que conoce la trascendencia de su acto. Ya sé que obtener esto no es fácil, pero también sé que lo que no se obtiene por el razonamiento no se obtiene tampoco por la fuerza. Si nuestro aparato militar de la revolución tiene que sostenerse por el miedo, ocurrirá que no habremos cambiado nada, salvo el color del miedo. Es solamente liberándose del miedo que la sociedad podrá edificarse en la libertad"

no son lo mismo las milicias libertarias organizadas de abajo hacia arriba, de coordinación voluntaria, consolidadas por la solidaridad en la igualdad y libertad, en que cada combatiene decide voluntariamente participar y cumplir con su parte en el plan hecho por un cómite en el que se ve representado

que los escuadrones de fusilamiento en la retaguardia para encargarse de los traidores propugnados por trotsky y franco

Posted by el de siempre at Wed Apr 19 20:41:20 2006

Vincezo- It's quite funny hearing your comments, because your errors are the same here in Spain. Nobody in these posts is defending fascists (in Spain Francoist, which is not the same). If you say in Spain that the 2nd Republic was a genocide regime (what is a fact, with the name of every woman and child executed in a vast list) you will be pointed as Francoist, I can tell you that this is not the case for me. It would be like saying that because I say Stalin is a mass murderer I would be defending Hitler (another one) because he opposed Stalin (after they both started 2nd World War).

Y para el anarquista- Informarte que fue precisamente el cese del boicot de los anarquistas a las elecciones a partir del 36 lo que permitio al Frente Popular ganar esas elecciones, sino se hubieran reproducido los resultados de elecciones anteriores. Precisamente a partir de ese momento fue cuando se recrudeció el genocidio en la II República (aunque ya era más bien un gobierno revolucionario, como admitían sus propios líderes).

Yo con los anarquistas que acepten el estado de derecho y quieran ejercer el anarquismo con sus propiedades y sus decisiones privadas no tengo ningún problema. El problema es cuando nos quieren imponer (históricamente mediante el uso del asesinato y el terrorismo) al resto de ciudadanos un sistema que anula las libertades personales anulando el estado de derecho. Yo no soy libre si no sé la leyes, y las leyes existen en cualquier grupo social, ya estén estas escritas y decididas por un cuerpo legislativo ya se dicten ad hoc, ad hominem y a posteriori en una parodia de democracia asamblearia.

Posted by Miguel A. Arévalo at Thu Apr 20 11:02:50 2006