Silent home servers
The computer which hosts this blog is a venerable Pentium 150Mhz, with
64Mb of physical memory and two decently sized disks. It has been running
non-stop mostly without hiccups for several years, and I'm quite happy with
it, even if the processing power is so scarce I've been having to tune down
some services as Debian has gotten more resource hungry, dist-upgrade after
dist-upgrade.
Natura is my 2nd oldest Debian install, coming back from Ham, and after a
while it became a home server when it was replaced by an Athlon 700Mhz at my
father's house. The only hardware incidents are all related to blackouts or
storms: two dead disks and one power supply. The CPU died years ago, but I
discovered that many months later. I guess it wasn't so necessary. :)
It is time to replace natura, though. The components are aging and they
have become quite noisy, despite my attempts to cleanup the dust. Lately it
is so loud that I can't understand how my dad can actually get work done with
that persistent noise in the room. Besides, it'd be good to get just a little
bit more of CPU power to do a few things that have been postponed for a while
now. I have been looking for offerings in the embedded devices market.
I am looking for a device with the following characteristics:
- Silent: this is a must. If fans aren't involved, that's
great, but I know there are some devices with just one fan for the hard
drives, etc. which are really silent too. Noise is the #1 reason I want to
get a replacement.
- CPU power and RAM: it doesn't need to be too powerful, but of course an
improvement over a Pentium 150 Mhz is expected. :) The minimal RAM would be
128Mb, I guess, and if it's expandable/replaceable, that'd be a big plus.
- Power consumption: I have other boxes around which I haven't used to
replace natura to get more CPU power because I've always assumed that it'd be
hard to match the Pentium's power consumption. As it's up 24/7, I want it to
be good in this area. AFAIK, the devices I'm looking for do quite well there,
though.
- Hard drives: many offerings accept two or four HDs inside the case. I won't
need four, but the possibility of setting up RAID is quite attractive.
- Hackable: should be supported by GNU/Linux, and if d-i does a good job
on it, bonus!
- Price: last, but not least, I'm willing to spend some money on this, but
I probably don't aim for the most expensive devices...
I've found that the
Thecus YES Box N2100
is one of the most interesting offerings: 2 Gigabit ethernet ports, two
internal SATA HD bays, 3 USB ports... but is a bit too expensive: 350€ (without
disks). tbm also told me to look at some
cheaper PowerPC devices, but I forgot the name right now.
So, dear Lazyweb, what would you recommend as a natura replacement for
a home server?
17:36 |
[/site] |
# |
(comments: 22)
We made it
I just came back home. I feel like I've been beaten up, my backbone is about
to crack in two pieces, and I've been sodomized by a few people.
But we made it. We've learned a few things in the process:
- Teruel-València arent 150 kilometres if you cycle through the Vía
Verde Ojos Negros and the Via Augusta. It is exactly 200.
- Full moon light is good enough to spots rocks and other obstacles on the
patch ahead, but mixed with extreme sleepiness, its usefulness decreases
significantly
- At some point, it doesn't matter if you cycle 150 or 200 kilometres. You
just don't feel your legs that much. Also, you stop being sleepy, and could
go on for more and more hours. I don't want to test the hard limits though.
:)
Good night!
11:06 |
[/travel] |
# |
(comments: 0)
From Teruel to València under the full moon
For a few years, the probably most intrepid group of triathletes in my
club have been doing cycling tours during the long weekend of the 9 d'Octubre
in València. We once did
a good chunk of the Ruta
del Cid, covering around 550 kilometres in 3 days and a half, carrying
aproximately 25 kilograms of sleeping bag, food and clothes on our bikes, and
going from Teruel to Albarracín, back to Teruel, then to Morella and back to
Albocàsser and through the Serra d'Espadà. The next year, we started
the trip in La Sènia, and crossed the Valencian Country all the way to
Requena, through Linares and Rubielos de Mora.
This year, we intended to cycle across the Pyrinees, from the Basque
Country to Catalonia, but in the end my travelmates have to work on Monday,
so we had to quickly settle on a one day alternative. As this is the 9
d'Octubre, the trip had to be a bit crazy, so we've decided to get the last
train up to Teruel, arriving there at 21:30 or so, have a very good dinner
around El Torico and soon after, start our way down to València, under
the full moon.
Our itinerary for tonight
We'll be carrying a few forehead lights and a bicycle light, and will really
hope that the sky isn't cloudy at all. We're really going to need the
moonlight. The route follows the national road from Sagunt to Teruel, through
an old train track which was turned into a cycling path. Most of the trip will
be descending, so covering the 150 kilometres shouldn't be too hard, except
that neither of us are specially trained now, unlike 3 years ago. If we end up
having to stop and sleep, that's going to be a problem as we are carrying no
sleepingbags or anything, just our winter cycling clothes. We pretend to take
our time, aka most of the night, to get to our destination, as we obviously
won't be able to cycle fast in the dark. But we'll manage. This is just crazy,
not impossible. :)
12:50 |
[/travel] |
# |
(comments: 3)
Debian etch will ship with GNOME 2.14
This is already old news, but I haven't commented here yet. We already
hinted this possibility in my
previous blog entry
on this topic, but sometime last week, we made it official.
After speaking to some people upstream, we got the impression that the GTK
situation was way too risky to do a GTK 2.10 migration, with no hints on when
the file selector problems would be solved. As of today, and two GTK 2.10
releases later, not all of the issues appear to have been resolved in this
branch, so we may have chosen the right path.
So, with this information in our hands, we described the whole situation
to the release managers, explaining what the options were, and they, of
course, had no doubt on what was better for etch.
The last two months before the release, we'll try to polish the last few
bits that we'd like to improve in the current 2.14 packages. For example,
Joss just made a change to the
session manager, to make it possible to save the user's session easily, a
feature which was present until GNOME 2.12, then removed in 2.14 with
apparently no sane replacement of saving sessions available for the user.
I must admit I'm a bit disappointed about not being to ship all the work
we've been doing with GNOME 2.16 in experimental, although I believe it was
the right choice. If the etch release is delayed for some major reason, and
let's hope it's not, that might open a window to see a transition going on,
if the fixes are finally in and we consider our packages release quality.
If not, we're sorry, but we won't be able to sell the “latest GNOME version”
argument in our release PR. ;)
The Debian GNOME team has already been talking about doing a “semi-official”
2.16 backport for etch though, so people can use stable with the current
GNOME, at least for a few months. We'll see how it goes...
21:45 |
[/freesoftware] |
# |
(comments: 11)